"I made a mistake, sir, 15 years ago!!!"
Its a pity Sanjay Dutt has been convicted for 6 YEARS!!!! I was looking forward to Munnabhai 3 and he is one of my favorite actors. I'm not saying that he is innocent but perhaps the sentence is too harsh. Sanjay Dutt is paying now for the mistakes he made in the drug-addict days of his youth and for the bad company that he kept.
What did he do? many ask. He illegally possessed weapons,stored and destroyed them. He purchased a .9 mm pistol,accepted an AK-56 rifle and ammunition from the underworld, ate with them and entertained their calls. But, we all know that Sanjay was able to kick his drug habit and concentrate on his life. He has improved as a person and an actor. The underworld maintained connection and paid attention to him because he was the son of a big star, rich and had all it takes to become a star. Maybe if Sanjay had done something else rather than acting,his underworld friends might have shown little or no interest in him.
It appears that the Bombay Riots were a causative factor for the Bombay Blasts. The resentment against the government and police by a body of muslim youth was exploited. They were brainwashed into taking revenge
People are arguing that what has been done with Sanjay is right and it shows that the law is same for all. But is it really???
The Srikrisna report found R.D. Tyagi, the joint commissioner,"guilty of excessive and unnecessary firing" that killed 9 muslims in the suleiman bakery incident. Tyagi was not punished, but he actually became the police commissioner of Mumbai; his case was discharged in April '03.
In the Wadala masjid sub-inspector Nikhil Kapse was found "guilty of unjustified firing" that killed 7 muslims. A departmental probe exonerated him.
Also, in the case of BJP leader Gopinath Munde, in "the vehicle in which his personal assistant Vivek Maitra was traveling, was found a revolver in Munde's name and one empty case". Both Mnde and Maitra were booked under TADA and the Arms Act. Soon, all the cases were dropped.
I think that the verdict against Sanjay Dutt was too harsh as he is now a better man. These people were also guilty, but never convicted.
Friday, August 10, 2007
Is the verdict right??????
Put up by Midnight Sun at 3:25:00 PM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 things said by people:
Yes it is.
If he committed some crime once, he deserves the penalty for it ... even if it is so many years later.
Fine so he made a mistake. But it was a heavy mistake to make. And if the judiciary let everyone who has "changed" loose, we wouldn't have had any prisoners.
Yeah, I mean, why is everything these actors do so overhyped? They're normal human beings, they don't have any more justification for being involved in terror plots than all the other convicts. No way is 6 years' RI too harsh.
Yeah, for that very reason, I don't welcome the bail order.
Post a Comment